This week’s
lecture and set reading focusses on discourse and power. Throughout the lecture
we covered topics based on discourse, discourse analysis and poststructuralism.
The lecture and key reading from Paul Long and Tim Wall described discourse as
a whole as “practices that systematically form the objects of which they speak”
(Foucault: Long & Wall (2012) p.363). As for discourse analysis, which
involves a close examination of text, the visual imagery and the sound and also
the written language. It considers both the form of the text and its “social
context, its construction, distribution and reception. It aims to understand
and elucidate the meanings and social significance of text.” (Smith and Bell
(2007) p.78)
The lecture and
key reading both discuss Michel Foucault’s idea of discourse as he considers
that discourse might be a way of controlling society. As stated above Foucaults
theory of discourse is described as “practices that systematically form the
objects of which they speak” (Foucault: Long & Wall (2012). There are a
variety of different ways to understand discourse, these two ways are Narrow
and Wide. Narrow is described as the written, spoken and visual elements i.e.
text and wide is considered to be described as a social practice. Photography’s,
art, video, or even games are all visual elements where we can use a visual
discourse as all these elements project some meaning to its audience. With
every visual element having a meaning behind them, they can be broken down and
discuss the meanings behind them, one method of doing this is through
Fairclough’s (2004) model (http://eltvoices.in/EVI25/EVI_25_12.pdf
p.187). Faircloughs method contains
three levels of analysis, the text itself, the discursive practice and the
sociocultural practice surrounding the text. The first element is text and
therefore this means that in this framework, one needs to pick a piece of text
to discuss. The second piece of the framework discusses the discursive
practice, this talks about an analysis of the production, consumption and
reproduction of a text, this is concerned by the way in which people interpret a
text and possible reproduce this. The final part of the framework is the sociocultural
practice, this explores the issue of power surrounding a text. It explores the
way in which discourse operates in “various different domains of socity” (http://eltvoices.in/EVI25/EVI_25_12.pdf
p.188).
The majority of
text have at least one discourse within it and therefore making it valid to
almost all subjects. Discourses allows one to further analyse a text however it
would not provide us with a definitive answer, more so an observation.
Reference:
Smith, Phillip and Bell, Alan (2007) Unravelling the Web of
Discourse Analysis in Devereux, Eoin (.ed) Media Studies Key Issues
and Debates. London: Sage
P.Long &
T.Wall (2012). Media Studies: Texts, Production, Context. 2nd ed.
London: Routledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment